China is exporting textiles to India through Bangladesh to get around a tax increase on imports, undermining New Delhi’s efforts to support local manufacturers, industry sources said.
Earlier this week, India doubled the import tax on more than 300 textile products to 20%, marking the second tax increase on textiles in as many months.
This is aimed at providing relief to the country’s domestic textile industry, which has been hit by cheaper imports.
India’s total textile imports jumped by 16% to a record $7bn in the fiscal year to March 2018.
Of this, about $3bn were from China.
Textiles are India’s second largest job provider directly employing nearly 51mn people and accounting for 5% of India’s gross domestic product, and 13% of its export earnings.
Industry officials said textile raw material from China is coming into India via Bangladesh, which has a free-trade agreement with India giving it access to the country’s $100bn textile market.
“Duty free fabric from China is coming to Bangladesh, getting converted and landing into India at zero duty,” Sanjay Jain, president of Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (CITI) told Reuters.
Industry bodies argue that India’s latest action is not enough to protect domestic garment manufacturers which are facing fierce competition from China and Bangladesh.
Imports of clothing accessories and apparel from Bangladesh – the world’s second largest exporter of ready-made garments – rose over 43% to $200.9mn during the year ended March 2018, according to Indian government data.
“Import trends suggests 40% to 50% of the garments were made with Chinese fibre,” said an Indian analyst who did not want to be named.
It is difficult to estimate exactly how many garments imported in India were produced with fibre sourced from China, he said.
India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka are among the signatories of the South Asian Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) that created a free-trade zone in the South Asian region.
Shipments of edible oils coming into India are also being designated as duty free under the regional free-trade pact, circumventing an import tax increase.
Trade bodies, which expect textile imports from Bangladesh to rise further, have asked the government to introduce a rule of origin for duty free imports.
Competition from China is forcing some businesses, such as polyester production facilities, to run idle, leading to job losses, they said.
“Under the SAFTA agreement and trade agreement with Bangladesh, only those goods should be exempted from custom duty, whose raw material is also manufactured by one of the SAFTA countries,” Dilip Chenoy, head of The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry said in a letter dated July 25 to a senior official in the government’s textile ministry.
Kavita Gupta, India’s textile commissioner told Reuters: “The textile ministry has proposed a ‘Fabric Forward Policy,’ where duty free access to garments will be provided if the fabric is sourced from India. The policy is in discussion stage.”
Rising imports sent India’s trade deficit with China in textile products (finished garments) to a record high $1.54bn in 2017/18, alarming industry officials as India had been until recently a net exporter of textile products to China.
There is a 10% price difference on average between textile products made in India and those made in China, according to FICCI.
The unit value of some Chinese products such as stockings, blouses and baby garments cost far less than produced in India.
LEAVE A COMMENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*
Gas fracking to start in England again next week after 7-year halt
India is said to keep buying Iranian oil despite US sanctions
India’s central bank leaves key lending rate unchanged
Unilever drops Dutch HQ move after British investors rebel
World Bank to help Pakistan textile mills conserve energy
China’s new bank loans seen rising in September
European stocks extend their downturn after US jobs data
Startup nation? Entrepreneurs still toil in Macron’s France
Tesla’s Musk mocks SEC as judge demands they justify fraud settlement