CBI clears Mulayam, Akhilesh in assets case
May 22 2019 12:24 AM
RELATED STORIES
Akhilesh Yadav
Akhilesh Yadav

IANS/New Delhi

The Central Bureau of Investigation has told the Supreme Court that it has cleared Samajwadi Party patriarch Mulayam Singh Yadav and his sons - party chief Akhilesh Yadav and Prateek Yadav - in a corruption case filed in 2013 as the allegations could not be established.
The clean chit to the Yadavs gains significance as it comes two days before counting of votes in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections tomorrow.
Earlier, the Yadavs had filed an affidavit claiming the case was purely political in nature, and has been brought out to coincide with the Lok Sabha election. The closure report is a big breather for the Yadavs, who had faced criticism in the wake of the allegations.
The premier investigating agency, in an affidavit submitted in the court earlier in May, said that after conducting a fair and impartial inquiry against the Yadav family, it took an independent decision to close the matter on August 7, 2013.
CBI spokesperson Nitin Wakankar told IANS that the agency had filed the status of the case on May 10 in the Supreme Court in response to a petition filed in the court in March.
The CBI had told the court that the inquiry was conducted in the spirit of the court’s direction on December 13, 2012, and it did not seek any kind of direction from the central government. Accordingly, it submitted a report with the Central Vigilance Commission and closed the case against the Yadavs on August 7, 2013.
“On careful examination of documents, statement of witnesses and the version of suspects during the course of further inquiry, sufficient evidence to support the allegations of possession of disproportionate assets, jointly or individually, against Mulayam Singh Yadav and his family members could not be brought out,” the CBI told the top court.
Delving into the nature of evidence available against Yadavs, the CBI, in the 23-page affidavit, said: “Since no prima facie evidence of the commission of cognisable evidence against the suspects was found during the inquiry, hence the preliminary inquiry was not converted into a criminal case or an FIR and as such no further inquiry was conducted after August 7, 2013.”
Interestingly, the CBI several times in the affidavit reiterated that it could not establish allegations of the Yadavs having acquired assets beyond their known sources of income.
On April 12, the agency, in an oral submission before a bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, told the court that it has already closed the case. The court had given four weeks’ time to it to file its response on the matter.
On March 25, an application filed by petitioner Vishwanath Chaturvedi had sought the court’s direction to the CBI to bring forth its investigation report in the case. Chaturvedi contended that the CBI has failed to inform the court on any substantial progress made on the case against Yadavs.
The agency said it was not under compulsion to report about its inquiry to any authority or person, but it will not restrict the media from communicating the final outcome on the case.
The CBI also said that it will be wrong to equate a preliminary inquiry with a criminal investigation, and hence it was not supposed to place a report before the jurisdictional court.
In December 2012, the court had directed CBI to initiate a probe against Akhilesh, while dropping the investigation against his wife, Dimple Yadav.
Mulayam, in his response, had said the top court never directed the CBI to register a regular case against him and his family, and ordered a prima facie inquiry. He also submitted before the court that Income Tax department reports on his assets do not show anything unfavourable, and these have been already placed before the apex court.



There are no comments.

LEAVE A COMMENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*
MORE NEWS
Strong winds likely Monday date6/17/2019 12:29:53 AM