Suu Kyi found guilty in widely criticised trial
December 06 2021 11:34 PM
Myanmar's State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi attends the joint news conference of the Japan-Mekong Su
Aung San Suu Kyi (file picture)


A court in military-ruled Myanmar yesterday found deposed leader Aung San Suu Kyi guilty of charges of incitement and breaching coronavirus restrictions, drawing international condemnation of what critics described as a “sham trial”.
Suu Kyi is set to serve two years in detention at an undisclosed location, a sentence reduced from four years after a partial pardon from the country’s military chief, state TV reported.
President Win Myint was also initially sentenced to four years as the court delivered its first verdicts in numerous cases against Suu Kyi, who led the former civilian government in the role of state counsellor, and other leaders ousted by the military in a coup on February 1.
Myanmar has been in turmoil since the coup against Suu Kyi’s democratically elected government led to widespread protests and raised international concern about the end of tentative political reforms following decades of military rule.
Suu Kyi’s supporters say the cases against her are baseless and designed to end her political career and tie her up in legal proceedings while the military consolidates power. Her conviction had been widely expected in Myanmar.
Demonstrators in the largest city, Yangon, risked arrest to stage a flash protest following the verdict yesterday. Nobel Peace Prize winner Suu Kyi, 76, has been detained since the coup, along with most senior leaders of her National League for Democracy (NLD) party. Others are abroad or in hiding.
“The conviction of the state counsellor following a sham trial in secretive proceedings before a military-controlled court is nothing but politically motivated,” UN human rights chief Michelle Bachelet said in comments echoed by the European Union and others.
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the conviction was “unjust” and called for the release of Suu Kyi and other detained elected officials.
A military spokesman did not respond to attempts to reach him for comment on the sentencing, which was widely reported in domestic media.
The military has not given details of where Suu Kyi — who spent years under house arrest due to her opposition to military rule before becoming Myanmar’s leader — is being detained. She is due to remain at that location to serve her sentence, MRTV reported, suggesting she will not be sent to prison. The trial in the capital Naypyitaw has been closed to the media and the junta’s public information outlets have not mentioned the proceedings.
Suu Kyi’s lawyers have been barred from communicating with the media and public.
Suu Kyi faces a dozen cases that include multiple corruption charges plus violations of a state secrets act, a telecoms law and Covid-19 regulations, which carry combined maximum sentences of more than a century in prison.
Suu Kyi and co-defendant Win Myint received terms of two years for incitement and the same term for breaches of coronavirus protocols, before state media announced that both had their terms halved in a pardon. They had denied the charges.
Western countries have demanded Suu Kyi’s release and criticised the violence since the coup in which some 1,300 people have been killed, according to rights groups. Liz Truss, Britain’s foreign minister, said Suu Kyi’s sentencing was “another appalling attempt by Myanmar’s military regime to stifle opposition and suppress freedom and democracy”.
The European Union’s top diplomat condemned the verdict as “politically motivated” and called for the immediate release of all political prisoners in Myanmar.
China, which has long had good relations with the military as well as Suu Kyi’s government, urged all parties to “bridge their differences”, while Japan, a major investor in Myanmar, said the verdict was an “unfavourable development”.
In a rare statement of condemnation, the chair of Norway’s Nobel Prize awards committee, Berit Reiss-Andersen, said the legal process had “low credibility’ and the conviction was part of the military’s suppression of the opposition.

There are no comments.

LEAVE A COMMENT Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*